NH BASS Federation Nation

HomeFAQSearchRegisterMemberlistUsergroupsLog in


 Lead Ban Modification. PLEASE REACT

Go down 


Number of posts : 85
Registration date : 2009-07-08

Lead Ban Modification. PLEASE REACT Empty
PostSubject: Lead Ban Modification. PLEASE REACT   Lead Ban Modification. PLEASE REACT EmptySun Feb 05, 2012 11:00 am

Please get the below message out to as many of our members as you can.

The proposed Senate Bill 224, if passed, would wipe out almost all of your jigs. It is critical that you let the 5 Senators on the Senate Energy & Natural Resources committee know what you think about this. If you stay silent on this issue, then you should not complain about losing your freedom. Ask the guys in Massachusetts what happens.

Senator Bob Odell bob.odell@leg.state.nh.us

Senator John Gallus john.gallus@leg.state.nh.us

Senator Jeb Bradley jeb.bradley@leg.state.nh.us

Senator Gary Lambert gary.lambert@leg.state.nh.us

Senator Amanda Merrill Amanda.merrill@leg.state.nh.us

Shown below is my last e-mail to this Senate committee . . .

Thanks for asking for our input on the proposed change in wording of SB224.

Can someone explain to me why the proponents of this bill wants to ban all painted lead head jigs of 1 oz. and yet exempt the small Clauser Minnow fly that has lead eyes? Could it be that they don’t want to tick off Trout Unlimited since this is a famous fly?

There is no way in the world that: 1. A loon is going to mistake a large 1 oz jig (or even a 3/8 oz jig) like this for a small piece of grit ; 2. there is no way a 4” – 6” perch (preferred prey of the loon) could fit a jig of this size in it’s tiny mouth, break off 12 lb. test line, flounder around attracting the attention of loon that then eats the whole works.

During their testimony on January 19, the Loon Preservation Committee (LPC) cited a masters thesis by Tiffany Grade. On page 17 & 18 of that thesis the author writes about LPC findings from 2000 - 2010, that the heaviest jig head found in a loon weighed 0.74 oz and the majority weighed less than 0.2 oz. She writes, “The longest jig head measured 1.3 in (33.3 mm), with the majority of the jig heads between 0.6-0.8 in”. She continues, “Most of the sinkers also weighed <0.2 oz (5.7g) and only one exceeded 1 oz). In other words, in 10 years they found 1 sinker in a loon that weighed 1 oz. In 10 years the LPC found that the majority of lead head jigs found in loons were less than 1” in overall length.

This tells me that our 2000 statute (RSA 211:13-b) has it about right. No surprise there since the statue was crafted after all stakeholders thoroughly discussed this issue and agreed. These facts also tell us that Vermont and Maine got it right too. The NH statute is twice as stringent as VT or ME (1/2 oz. vs. 1 oz sinkers)

What is more important is defining what a “lure” is. To the vast majority of bass anglers, a “jig” is an artificial lure that is retrieved in a lift & drop manner. A jig head is never fished naked . . . it invariably has a plastic trailer or worm attached, often has a rubber, silicone, or vinyl skirt, and may also have a fiber weedguard . . . a jig head is normally a key component of the lure.

The proposed new wording advocated by the NH Lakes Association would exempt “lead core line, spinnerbaits, buzzbaits, spoons, poppers, plugs or flies.” What about chatterbaits? Is the famous ice fishing jig, the Swedish Pimple a “jig” or a “lure”or a “spoon”.

The proposed new wording for SB 224 would wipe out almost all of the jigs commonly used by bass anglers and would destroy several NH businesses without making a significant difference in the overall loon population in NH. Tungsten jigs are not available in the common weights used by bass anglers, and even if they were the costs would be prohibitive.

Please keep in mind that any changes in fishing regulations will have an impact on over 250,000 anglers who fish in NH every year: 108,000 NH residents who are 16 and older, 120,000 non-residents 16 and over, and the rest are kids who like to fish. In 2006 these anglers spent $177 million in NH.*

In the spirit of compromise, we would be willing to agree to increasing the banned overall length of jig heads from the current `1” to 1 ˝ “ and retain the current 1 oz or less ban on sinkers. Even doing this is unlikely to make a significant difference in the overall loon population which has been gradually increasing since 1975.

* 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation Data compiled by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and the U.S. Census Bureau.

Richard “Dick” Smith
Conservation Director
New Hampshire Bass Federation

Approved by Dan Dufour
New Hampshire Bass Federation Nation
Conservation Director

Back to top Go down
View user profile


Number of posts : 47
Age : 54
Localisation : 92 Trask Side Road - Alton Bay, NH 03810
Registration date : 2007-01-31

Lead Ban Modification. PLEASE REACT Empty
PostSubject: My Letter as YD   Lead Ban Modification. PLEASE REACT EmptyMon Feb 06, 2012 4:08 pm

Dear Senators,
My name is Ray Meyer and I just happen to be a member and officer of the NH Bass Federation Nation. I serve in the capacity of Youth Director and also the Coordinator of the only Youth Club in the state, the NH Jr Bassmasters.

I must say that this Senate Bill 224 is really upsetting to me, my youth anglers, their parents and to the members of my own adult club. Do we really need to go this far with banning such a broad range of tackle that we use quite frequently? Let’s use some common sense to this whole thing. If all the education and current lead ban efforts are working in favor of the Loon population and its growth and prosperity, why then do we create so much angst among one group of individuals with little to no proof that this additional measure will even help the situation? Does the Live Free or Die State have to micro-legislate to this level? I believe we do not and we can be reasonable.

I also believe that you are all reasonable and educated on the subject enough that you can see my logic and frustration. We do know from the folks at Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine (http://www.tufts.edu/vet/loons/ ) that most lead objects eaten by loons are:
• Less than one ounce
• Less than an inch long
• Less than a half inch wide
Again, why are we going too far with this new ban?
I do not wish to tell my 11 year old that he can no longer use a percentage of his tackle “just because”. This “just because” will put manufacturers and sport shops out of business and will make alternative metals like tungsten even more expensive over time. The 86 cent painted jig head I use now is already $2.33 in tungsten. Demand and lack of competition will drive that jig up in price significantly. Let’s not create scenarios in an economy that can ill afford more restrictions creating job loss and financial burden.
Please do not support this bill.
Respectfully yours,
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/bassmaster/youth/index
Lead Ban Modification. PLEASE REACT
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
» JR to JR buddy lead
» Pour some lead!!
» Some new lead weights
» Info on WAANYARRA VIC please
» Turnigy Accucel 6 lipo charger LiPo/LiFe and NiMH Nicad

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
NH BASS Federation Nation :: Federation Nation News :: Dock Talk-
Jump to: